[LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant.

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 12:44 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf
> <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net> wrote:
>         On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 09:19 -0800, Len Ovens wrote:
>         > On Sat, December 22, 2012 7:42 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>         > > On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 14:58 +0000, John Murphy wrote:
>         > >> Synth manufacturers: Why no ADAT out?
>         > >
>         > > Would be nice for homestudios today, assumed there would
>         be cheap cards
>         > > with several ADAT inputs. My RME card only has got one
>         ADAT, that btw.
>         > > does not work with Linux.
>         
> 
> and what card would that be?

RME HDSPe AIO

>         ADAT can do 48KHz, 96KHz and 192KHz. Nobody will use 44.1KHz
>         for
>         pro-audio, so that wouldn't cause an issue.
> 
> the usual ralph misinformation. does it ever stop?
> 
> ADAT supports 44.1kHz and 48kHz as-is. With the S-Mux "standard", it
> can route 88.2kHz and 96kHz signals, but each channel is split across
> two ADAT channels, causing a 50% reduction in the number of available
> channels.

Can you give an example for misinformation by me?

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2012-November/013570.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2012-November/013572.html

Regards,
Ralf