[Consortium] Official fork

rosea.grammostola rosea.grammostola at protonmail.com
Sun Feb 21 11:28:47 CET 2021




Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Saturday, February 20, 2021 4:14 PM, rosea.grammostola <rosea.grammostola at protonmail.com> wrote:

> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Saturday, February 20, 2021 2:52 PM, Fons Adriaensen fons at linuxaudio.org wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 07:41:56PM +0000, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> >
> > > Of course, a generic solution/rule would be good so we don't have
> > > this issue with other projects in the future again.
> >
> > IMHO, no more 'rules' are required, and this matter should be
> > put to rest.
>


@Fons, you can't say that the linuxaudio.org is a joke when people just use the name linuxaudio.org for a fork like this and release it as it was released by linuxaudio.org, and say at the same time that this matter should be put to rest, without taking any action.

Then the simple conclusion would be that linuxaudio.org consortium is a joke an stays a joke. And why should people put this matter to rest then? Then we still have this unfair situation.

@Spencer and @Robin, what's your take on a solution for this matter?

Regards,

\r


More information about the Consortium mailing list