[Jack-Devel] Looking for help setting up NetJack over WLAN from a Windoze box

Malik Costet jack-devel at malikc.neomailbox.net
Tue May 23 19:47:52 CEST 2017


On 2017-05-23 18:22, Hanspeter Portner wrote:
> On 23.05.2017 16:50, jack-devel at malikc.neomailbox.net wrote:
>> ...But it only works great over Ethernet. And I'd very much like it to
>> work over WLAN, which it doesn't. Over wireless, the sound is completely
>> garbled. AFAICT, it's a network issue.
> 
> NetJACK sends its audio data via UDP [1], e.g. there's no resending of lost
> packets like in TCP. If packets are lost (which is *very* likely over wireless),
> the packets are really lost and you miss a chunk of audio frames, hence your
> garbled sound at the receiver.
> 
>> That being said, reading the doc and looking around the web for info
>> suggests it might very well be the case that NetJack2 simply isn't
>> suited for WLAN transport. Indeed, some resources indicate that NetJack1
>> would be more adapted.
> Same problem there...
> 
> [1]
> https://github.com/jackaudio/jackaudio.github.com/wiki/WalkThrough_User_NetJack2#8-why-do-i-miss-packets-

Thanks for the reply!

So your view is that packet loss is the cause? I had naïvely assumed it
might be due to latency or congestion, but packet loss would make a lot
of sense. Although -- I hadn't mentioned this explicitly, but my setup
is with both boxes connected on the same local network, in other words
both to the same WiFi router; can there really be such a dramatic amount
of packet loss in that context for the result to be completely garbled
sound? I'm not talking about clicks here and there, but really little
better than static. I wouldn't have expected that; although at the same
time I'm no networking expert...

If so, then I guess what you're saying is that there's simply no way to
leverage NetJack, whether NetJack1 or NetJack2, for transport over
wireless?

Regards,
 mc.



More information about the Jackaudio mailing list