[linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)

[Joern Nettingsmeier]

Tim Hockin wrote:
> 
> > > Why? What is it that LADSPA does that would be so complicated that an
> > > instrument API must not support it?
> >
> > Nothing, OAPI or whatever will be a superset I imagine, but that implies
> > that LADSPA will still be simpler.
> 
> yeah, and I want to make it easy for an OAPI (I HATE that name - open to
> ideas..) host to use LADSPA plugins.  That is very important.

Linux Audio Developers' More Sophisticated Plugin API (=LADMSPA) ? :-D

-- 
Jörn Nettingsmeier     
Kurfürstenstr 49, 45138 Essen, Germany      
http://spunk.dnsalias.org (my server)
http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/ (Linux Audio Developers)