[linux-audio-dev] IRQ rotation
Steve Harris
S.W.Harris at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Fri Mar 5 18:30:58 UTC 2004
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:09:31AM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:06:27PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> > It used to be possible (in the 2.0 kernel series) to the rotate priority of
> > IRQs on the two controllers. This sounds really good as on my laptop the
> > soundcard is welded to IRQ5 (very low priority) and everything else is on
> > IRQ10 (higher, c.f. http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69/Arcana.html sec
> > 2.4), so I can only run the card with big buffers.
>
> This really mattered? I'm honestly DEEPLY surprised, and a bit sceptical.
> IRQ priority will only matter AT ALL if you are in a constant state of
> interrupt, or your IRQ handlers are painfully slow, neither of which should
> be true.
Heres /proc/interrupts after ~3 hours of uptime.
CPU0
0: 12578480 XT-PIC timer
1: 22347 XT-PIC keyboard
2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
5: 0 XT-PIC Maestro3
8: 1 XT-PIC rtc
10: 58915 XT-PIC usb-uhci, ohci1394, eth0, Texas
Instruments PCI4451 PC card Cardbus Controller, Texas Instruments PCI4451
PC card Cardbus Controller (#2)
11: 774663 XT-PIC nvidia
12: 28909 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse
14: 16635 XT-PIC ide0
NMI: 0
ERR: 0
Everything beats the soundcard, including the video drivers.
- Steve
More information about the Linux-audio-dev
mailing list