[linux-audio-dev] Old hat - comparison against windows
frsmith at gmail.com
Wed Jan 31 10:00:41 UTC 2007
I would not rule out that Linux is found to perform worse under some
circumstances. But that is ok. Adaptability is one of the strong points
of open source, once we know the problems we can start fixing them.
Nice point and this is the strength of OS. the problems are addressed far
quicker than in Prop' software.
On 31/01/07, Robert Jonsson <rj at spamatica.se> wrote:
> torbenh at gmx.de skrev:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:18:06PM +0000, Bob Ham wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 21:05 +0000, Bob Ham wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 09:03 -0800, Michael Ost wrote:
> >>>> Can anyone suggest ways to compare audio/midi performance between
> >>>> and Windows that ... make Linux compare favorably?
> >>>> I work for a company that sells a Linux based piece of hardware that
> >>>> plays windows VSTs.
> >>> The word "FUD" comes to mind. No idea why.
> >> Further to that, something constructive: perhaps you could try telling
> >> your customers why *you* chose linux, rather than trying to find
> >> to tell them *they* should.
> > the customers dont notice. they still use windows or no computers at
> > all.
> > it looks rather like a question from the management.
> Whatever the reasons, it's a valid and interesting question. In truth
> Linux is often touted (not the least with respect to audio) as a better
> performer than Windows.
> Though I can't say that I have personally experienced this. It is hard
> work getting a Linux system "tuned", I have actually never succeeded
> without some drawback that have forced me back to generic configurations.
> Not that I complain, my current (k)ubuntu kernel performs "good
> enough"tm, but I am certain it would be no problem getting equal
> performance under Windows. My choice of using Linux has more to do with
> the freedom of opensourceness (it's a word!..now atleast).
> Steve's idea with a vst timing plugin sounds very interesting. One using
> LADSPA would be equally interesting for comparing Linux to Linux. Are
> there other performance measurements that would be nice? xruns under
> load I suppose.
> Having a test suite for system performance would be great!
> I would not rule out that Linux is found to perform worse under some
> circumstances. But that is ok. Adaptability is one of the strong points
> of open source, once we know the problems we can start fixing them.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Linux-audio-dev