[LAD] LADSPA dilemma

Tim Goetze tim at quitte.de
Sat Jun 16 14:34:19 UTC 2007

[Fons Adriaensen]

>It would also be possible to define that calling run() with nframes
>equal to zero means 'update your internal state to the current 
>control values', but this not specified in the LADSPA specs.

I really like this idea.  True, it might break some plugins, namely of 
course those that divide by the number of frames without looking at 
its value -- but these are likely to be the ones that do parameter 
smoothing already, and would be updated first.

A simple redefinition of what is already in place that gains us quite 
a lot of control over parameter smoothing.  Very elegant, I think.


More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list