[LAD] LADSPA dilemma
tim at quitte.de
Sat Jun 16 14:34:19 UTC 2007
>It would also be possible to define that calling run() with nframes
>equal to zero means 'update your internal state to the current
>control values', but this not specified in the LADSPA specs.
I really like this idea. True, it might break some plugins, namely of
course those that divide by the number of frames without looking at
its value -- but these are likely to be the ones that do parameter
smoothing already, and would be updated first.
A simple redefinition of what is already in place that gains us quite
a lot of control over parameter smoothing. Very elegant, I think.
More information about the Linux-audio-dev