[LAD] Summercode 2008: LASH, pt. 3

[Bob Ham]

On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 18:18 +0200, Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
> Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > I fail the see the advantage of D-Bus over e.g. OSC via UDP or TCP.

> The core issue is abstracting the interfaces involved. As long as it
> serves to free LASH from being a libjack client

Why is freeing LASH from being a libjack client a goal?

Bob

-- 
Bob Ham <rah at bash.sh>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20080204/909c40fd/attachment.pgp>