[LAD] Summercode 2008: LASH, pt. 3

[Arnold Krille]

Am Montag, 4. Februar 2008 schrieb Bob Ham:
> On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 18:18 +0200, Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
> > Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > > I fail the see the advantage of D-Bus over e.g. OSC via UDP or TCP.
> > The core issue is abstracting the interfaces involved. As long as it
> > serves to free LASH from being a libjack client
> Why is freeing LASH from being a libjack client a goal?

If you want 'real' session management, you also want to save the jack-settings 
per session. That is not possible as long as lash needs a running jack to 
start.
And as more and more users have not only one session per computer but both 
multiple sessions per computer and multiple computers per session, that is 
another reason to part lash from jack-as-a-dependency

Arnold
-- 
visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me 
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your 
administrator to do so...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20080205/b9339761/attachment.pgp>