[LAD] LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer

[Steve Harris]

On 23 Jan 2008, at 00:50, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
>
> Calm down guys, Benno is just a bit frustrated about the apparently  
> low
> interest of LV2 becoming a broad standard. The misplaced attributes  
> here and
> there are just caused by this frustration, and hey, it's quite  
> pointless to
> argue about this issue, because it's not our business anyway. :)
> I'm sure the Reaper guys will seek a dicussion theirselfes in case  
> they're
> really interested in the LV2 issue.

That's fair enough, but it's very early in the day, LV2 has only been  
finalised for a few weeks, and it's not even widely adopted internally  
by LAD people, so I wouldn't expect commercial software people to be  
that interested yet.

To my mind it's better for us to develop a large suite of tools and  
plugins to demonstrate the viability and advantages before we go  
courting other implementations. There are bound to be changes and  
additions made to libslv2 to make it easier on implementers.

- Steve