[LAD] [OT] LinuxSampler and GPL - some clarifications

Marek mlf.conv at gmail.com
Mon Jan 28 14:16:11 UTC 2008


On Jan 28, 2008 11:37 AM, Dennis Schulmeister
<linux-audio-dev at windows3.de> wrote:
> > The GPL doesn't *address* compensation for distribution at all.
>
> I understand your point of a missing compensation mechanism very well.
> And surely open-source developers would be thankful if they could get
> something back in return. Be it code or even money so they can make a
> living. But although compensation is in no way enforced or even assured
> it's already happening. On a voluntary basis.
>
> The problem I see is the very moment you add a compensation mechanism to
> the terms of the GPL (or any similar license terms) y

No. GPL doesn't include any compensation mechanism at all. It
implicitly prohibits from using the program licensed under the terms
of GPLfor any commercial purpose other than charging for distribution.

Marek



More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list