[LAD] LADSPA latency port, was Re: Let's kill EPAMP???

[Lars Luthman]

On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 09:52 +0100, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On 03/06/2008, Steve Harris <steve at plugin.org.uk> wrote:
> > In LADSPA there's a "magic" control out port called "_latency" or
> > something, that should apply to LV2 aswell, but I'm not sure if the
> > spec says so.
> 
> For the record -- since this is something I've tried to search for in
> the past and have had trouble finding a definitive answer to -- the
> conventional LADSPA port name is apparently "latency", with no
> underscore.

In LV2 it's whatever port has the lv2:reportsLatency property set.


--ll
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20080603/2b382b10/attachment.pgp>