[LAD] Fwd: Fw: Re: At the hands of Professor Keller and Raymond

[laseray at gmail.com]

On Tuesday 28 July 2009 23:18:03 David Robillard wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:01 -0400, laseray at gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:38:03 David Robillard wrote:
> > > at revision 12, this project is (in my non-lawyer non-authoritative
> > > opinion, etc), very obviously and correctly licensed under the GPL
> > > version 2 or later, in the way recommended by the FSF.
> >
> > The raw code seems okay over there. Running ant to make a dist
> > package results in something that violates the GPL if a user were
> > to distribute it.
>
> No, it does not, and even if it did, this would not be a GPL violation
> on Prof. Keller's part.

Yes, it does. I just did it a little while ago. There is no license file in 
it. I checked the dist/zip targets.

And way to go putting words in my mouth. I never said, or even hinted
what you are saying. Reading a little too much into things are we.

Raymond