[LAD] [RFC] LADSPA 1.2

Stefano D'Angelo zanga.mail at gmail.com
Thu Jun 18 21:59:34 UTC 2009


2009/6/18 Damon Chaplin <damon at karuna.eclipse.co.uk>

>
> On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 23:23 +0200, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
>
> > Sorry, didn't see that. Well, I guess there's no problem on the plugin
> > side then... any other possible problems on the host side?
> >
> > In case there are none, we could add an array or another callback.
>
> You'd need a way to let the host know if the plugin is version 1.1 or
> 1.2. Otherwise the host might try to use the new fields which might be
> garbage.
>
> I can't see a way of getting a LADSPA version number from a plugin at
> present. Maybe a ladspa_version() function could be added (outside
> LADSPA_Descriptor!), defaulting to 1.1.
>
> But I'd probably just go for the ladspa_get_port_value_enums() function
> and leave LADSPA_Descriptor untouched, just to be safe


You're right. Well, I vote for the extra function and leaving descriptor
untouched too.

Stefano
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20090618/86f809cb/attachment.html>


More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list