[LAD] [RFC] LADSPA 1.2

[Fraser]

Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
> Such a change could also give you problems if you expose
> implementation-defined values (as opposed to real-life-compatible units)
> to users. Think of backward compatibility, for example.

good point.

>> While ideas are being tossed about, here are some more...
>>   
> Be careful: I can't speak for everyone, but after years of stagnation it
> would be nice to get a useful 1.2 out of the door without trying to cram
> every possible good idea into it.

fair play, it was late and I was overly enthusiastic :)
does anyone have access to ladspa.org? perhaps these and other ideas can be
noted in some sort of a roadmap?

regards,
Fraser