[LAD] RFC: Default discovery paths for LADSPA, LRDF, LV2 and DSSI (and more?)

Steve Harris steve at plugin.org.uk
Fri Jun 26 10:45:34 UTC 2009


On 25 Jun 2009, at 18:01, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
>
> It is reasonable for LADSPA hosts to show duplicate versions of a  
> plugin, for LV2 I guess the user would have to choose which  
> implementation to use instead (this is because of URIs), unless  
> there are better ways to handle this... Dave?

It's not reasonable unless they have different LADPSA IDs. LADSPA  
plugins are not supposed to change their behaviour significantly  
without changing IDs.

It's not really a tenable situation anyway, how would the user pick  
between them? If you want to move apps, how would the other host pick  
the same one reliably?

- Steve



More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list