[LAD] Kernel Opinions: .31-rt or .33-rt?

Ralf Mardorf ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net
Thu Apr 29 18:47:18 UTC 2010

torbenh wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 08:11:31PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> torbenh wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:27:07AM -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
>>>> Does anyone out there have an opinion on linux kernel 2.6.31-rt vs.
>>>> 2.6.33-rt for audio?
>>> i am in the process of updating.
>>> had some problems with udev not creating device nodes for my HD
>>> partitions.
>>> i think i solved them. (didnt reboot yet)
>>> make sure the deprecated sysfs interface is off.
>>> according to blackpenguin the symptoms match.
>>> i also had a lockup when hal was started.
>>> dunno... 2.6.31-rt (which i am running now) was a little bit less painless.
>> Do you build it for Debian or Ubuntu? When I tried to build it for
>> Hardy (64 Studio) the same way as I build my current kernel uname -r
>>, it failed.
>> http://lists.64studio.com/pipermail/64studio-users/2010-April/004359.html
> debian. dunno. still seems to be wrong.
> i am running it now, but i needed to mknod the HD device nodes.

Do you build the kernel using make-kpkg? To be honest, for Hardy I never 
used "--append-to-version=-1", but I did this for Karmic and there it 
worked for However that be, modifying 

-UTS_RELEASE_VERSION=$(shell if [ -f include/linux/version.h ]; then \
- grep 'define UTS_RELEASE' include/linux/version.h | \
+UTS_RELEASE_VERSION=$(shell if [ -f include/linux/utsrelease.h ]; then \
+ grep 'define UTS_RELEASE' include/linux/utsrelease.h | \

might solve the problem?!


More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list