[LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support

[Nedko Arnaudov]

rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola at gmail.com> writes:

> Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
>>   
>>> I'm just saying that it might not be such a good idea for a session
>>> manager to kill applications instead of saving them, when asked to
>>> save.  Especially if that decision is based on user input that
>>> happened a long time ago (so that the user may have done a lot of work
>>> since making their mistake, but before discovering it was a mistake).
>>>     
>>
>> What better alternative you propose? ladish will implement levels 2 and
>> 3 in future.
>>
>>   
> I understand the concern of Chris. All though I didn't make the mistake 
> yet when working with Ladish.
>
> Isn't it possible to popup some kind of warning message "you've chosen 
> level 1, but this is not supported by this app"
> Or another solution which helps the user not making this fault?

If ladish knows whether level 1 is really supporeted it wouldnt be
needed for user to specify it. Such warning message will be possible
when app (.desktop files) list is implemented. But i'd rather disallow
user to override the level from the UI, instead user can change the
.desktop file or override it with another one in the user specific
filesystem location.

-- 
Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20100108/5e75cf42/attachment.pgp>