[LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support

rosea grammostola rosea.grammostola at gmail.com
Fri Jan 8 12:54:52 UTC 2010


Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
> rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola at gmail.com> writes:
>
>   
>> Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
>>     
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> I'm just saying that it might not be such a good idea for a session
>>>> manager to kill applications instead of saving them, when asked to
>>>> save.  Especially if that decision is based on user input that
>>>> happened a long time ago (so that the user may have done a lot of work
>>>> since making their mistake, but before discovering it was a mistake).
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> What better alternative you propose? ladish will implement levels 2 and
>>> 3 in future.
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> I understand the concern of Chris. All though I didn't make the mistake 
>> yet when working with Ladish.
>>
>> Isn't it possible to popup some kind of warning message "you've chosen 
>> level 1, but this is not supported by this app"
>> Or another solution which helps the user not making this fault?
>>     
>
> If ladish knows whether level 1 is really supporeted it wouldnt be
> needed for user to specify it. Such warning message will be possible
> when app (.desktop files) list is implemented. But i'd rather disallow
> user to override the level from the UI, instead user can change the
> .desktop file or override it with another one in the user specific
> filesystem location.
>
>   
It looked to me as an advantage of Ladish that I, as a user, was able to 
choose on which level I want to use the application. As I see it now, I 
would like to keep that possibility.

\r




More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list