[LAD] RAUL or other libraries for real this time? ;-)

Iain Duncan iainduncanlists at gmail.com
Thu Nov 17 20:00:11 UTC 2011


Great, I'll likely be a user then! Was planning on using boost whenever
possible anyway.

iain

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Tim Blechmann <tim at klingt.org> wrote:

> > Thanks Tim, I'll def check it out. What's the difference to a newbie like
> > myself between yours and the one in Jack?
> >
> > Congrats btw, that's awesome that your work will be in boost!
>
> the main difference is prbly that the jack ringbuffer is plain c and prbly
> needs libjack, while boost.lockfree is a c++ library and header-only.
>
> cheers, tim
>
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Tim Blechmann <tim at klingt.org> wrote:
> > > > part I need library help with is likely synchronization and
> > > > interprocess/interthread communication. ( ie do I use the jack
> > >
> > > ringbuffer?
> > >
> > > > Do I look at boost queue implementations? does RAUL have a higher
> > > > level
> > > > convenience ring buffer?
> > >
> > > my boost.lockfree library has been accepted and will be shipped with
> > > future boost releases. it contains an mpmc-stack, an mpmc-queue and a
> > > wait-free spsc
> > > ringbuffer (same algorithm as the jack/kernel/supercollider
> ringbuffer).
> > >
> > > git repo: http://tim.klingt.org/git?p=boost_lockfree.git;a=summary
> > > (note that the addressing_reviews branch will be the one that will go
> > > into boost)
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20111117/98430a09/attachment.html>


More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list