[LAD] Non Session Management

[thijs van severen]

2012/3/29 Louigi Verona <louigi.verona at gmail.com>

> my 2 cents from user perspective: I know where I save my files, I know
> where my sample collections are. i know that if i delete my sample
> collection, sessions won't load. i don't need any program to tell me
> that.
>
> in fact, in using FL Studio or Cubase or LMMS you have the same
> situation. a project can use same files as another project and if you
> damage those files - well, sorry.
>
> I do not see any reason for complications in session manager design. i
> agree with david, all of this is unnecessary and only will make NSM a
> session manager developers would be reluctant to adopt.
>
> louigi verona.
>
> On 3/29/12, rosea.grammostola <rosea.grammostola at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 03/24/2012 11:09 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> 3. Clearly defining the way an app should behave w.r.t. its
> >>     File menu entries (when managed). This is quite intrusive
> >>     to existing clients, but it is IMHO absolutley essential.
> >>     Kudos to the designer(s) for the having the courage to do
> >>     this instead of allowing application developers to take
> >>     the 'least effort' way (which would of course be better
> >>     marketing, but invite later misery).
> >
> > How easy or how difficult is it compared to JackSession for example, to
> > add NSM support to an application?
> >
> > Is it possible to have NSM and JackSession support in one application?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > \r
>


wasnt there a link somewhere in this mail thread about a comparison of all
the pros and cons of 'all' SM's ?
i went trough the thread but could not find it  :-(
ah well, maybe i'm just dreaming
would be nice though, such a comparison matrix


follow me on my Audio & Linux blog <http://audio-and-linux.blogspot.com/> !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20120329/d6dc863d/attachment.html>