[LAD] Jack ring buffer (again)
dev at open-music-kontrollers.ch
Sat May 14 08:47:05 UTC 2016
On 14.05.2016 09:18, Will Godfrey wrote:
> I'm not sure if this has been covered before...
Similar questions seem to come up every couple of months.
> While I understand that generally you can't be certain of writing or reading
> all bytes in a block of data in one call, what about the specific case where
> you *always* read and write the same number of bytes and the buffer is an exact
> multiple of this size.
> e.g data block is 5 bytes & buffer size is 75 bytes.
> No I'm not intending to use such an example, I just want to cover worst case :)
> If that doesn't work, what about the case when you are always working in
> powers of 2?
> e.g data block is 16 bytes & buffer size is 1024 bytes.
libjack *always* allocates a buffer of size (2^x).
*but* 1 byte is reserved to discriminate between *empty* and *full*
state of the buffer, the usable size of ringbuffer thus is actually (2^x
More information about the Linux-audio-dev