[linux-audio-user] sampling at high frequencies
eviltwin69 at cableone.net
Mon Jan 26 08:56:05 EST 2004
AFAIK the only reason for going to 96KHz is to allow for digital effects
processing to do a better job. Maybe some people can hear a difference
on *very* expensive equipment but eventually you have to go to 16 bit
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 03:19, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
> Florin Andrei wrote:
> > Anyone here using 192kHz for sampling?
> are you trying to record for dogs or bats ? ;)
> seriously, the only measurably effect of 192k is that it fills up your
> disks faster and eats more cpu when processing.
> imnsho, all this sampling rate hype is a clever industry ploy to keep
> people from thinking that their hardware is finally good enough and they
> can stop buying now.
> people can't hear over 20k. period. 48k sampling rate gives you 24k
> minus what's cropped off by the aliasing filter. granted, higher
> sampling allows you to use a simpler, less steep aliasing filter, and
> some people claim to perceive an improvement from that. but even then,
> 96k should be enough.
> "I never use EQ, never, never, never. I previously used to use mic
> positioning but I've even given up on that too."
> - Jezar on http://www.audiomelody.com
> Jörn Nettingsmeier
> Kurfürstenstr 49, 45138 Essen, Germany
> http://spunk.dnsalias.org (my server)
> http://www.linuxaudiodev.org (Linux Audio Developers)
More information about the Linux-audio-user