[linux-audio-user] FOLKS, PAY ATTENTION TO NOTEEDIT, the score editor!

[Carlos Pino]

I. I. Ooisen wrote:

>>    I'm not a good music reader nor writer,but when i need it Is
>>faster for me to write by hand.
>>    
>>
>
>why, do you write it in adobe? :D))
>
>
>  
>
 Sorry my english is too much poor to understand this,I mean paper and  
pencil :\

>>Last night I was playing with it and trying to
>>find the way to have a "normal" view (for me) of the score.Im
>>accustomed to the real book,and I like to write my scores  in that
>>way,simple melody line and chords over,each line divided in four
>>bars,to have a clear preview of what I'm writing and  reading,but
>>have not succes.This is not the first time I find  this issue,and
>>probably the main cause,between others with no direct relationship
>>with noteedit,that made me reject the use and more extensive test of
>>the program.
>>    
>>
>
>finale has a reputation for having (at least in its first versions) the 
>most idiotic, un-intuitive, and frustrating interface in the history of 
>software. believe me.
>  
>
  I believe you,I don't know Finale.

>don't compare noteedit with finale.
>
 I didn't,I only name it in my post because  here,  
http://rnvs.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de/~jan/noteedit/noteedit.html  
 that is in the open post  of this thread , is named as part of the 
reason of the discontinuation of the project.

> they are conceived differently. 
>noteedit is more like "nwc" ("noteworthy composer") for windows, which 
>is a much friendlier design.
>  
>
    Don't know  nwc,neither.Does it have the feature to see  the sheet 
as a "normal" paper,and not one line only?

>just try noteworthy composer (for windows, not gpl), and you'll see what 
>i mean. then try NOTEEDIT.
>  
>

    Ok, goin to be difficult  presently as  I don't use windows 
anymore,but if I got the chance,I will.
   

  Saludos
 
  --Carlos.