[linux-audio-user] The BIG picture
badmuthahubbard at gmail.com
Wed Dec 27 18:25:54 EST 2006
On 12/24/06, Patrick Shirkey <pshirkey at boosthardware.com> wrote:
> Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
> > At any rate, I can't imagine a professional audio studio today being
> > without some Macs, but I hope Linux can change that.
> Broadcast studios are different beasts.
> > For that to
> > happen, though, would take lots more application development and
> > especially interface development.
> I agree that we need more Linux dev but that's kind of like saying we
> need new solutions to the words pollution problem.
> It's just a matter of time.
> As long as I'm around there will be dev and I know of at least 500 other
> people who feel the same way...
> Our general policy is: "The more, the merrier".
Ho ho ho. Yes, the more of you, the merrier. heh
If I end up doing more serious audio programs, I expect to keep them
free, but I can't see myself doing Linux development. So far the only
thing I've made that could be called a program is a patch for
composing in alternate tuning systems for Pure Data. It is complex,
though, and would certainly be regarded as a program if rewritten in
Anyway, one thing I notice is that Linux lovers seem to esteem
programs for their power, whereas the average user (even
"professional" content people) will notice the interface more- power
is cheap these days. And I could be wrong, but it seems like, if
someone is only writing a program out of their own interest,
programming the interface is likely to be the least interesting part.
Although, as I've learned in the last few weeks, reverse-engineering
wifi and audio drivers is just as urgent a task.
Btw, one thing I've found completely missing from Linux and the free
software world is an audio/MIDI sequencer that can sync to video. If
anyone knows of one, I'd love to get my hands on it.
"Far and away the best prize that life has to offer is the chance to
work hard at work worth doing."
More information about the Linux-audio-user