[linux-audio-user] Re: Need for JACK Rack (2)?

Loki Davison loki.davison at gmail.com
Mon Feb 6 08:17:06 EST 2006


On 2/6/06, leslie.polzer at gmx.net <leslie.polzer at gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Hello Loki,
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:11:58AM +1100, Loki Davison wrote:
>
> > As i said originally, om is big and powerful with it's standard gui.
> > The engine however is very light weight
>
> Also in terms of dependencies?
>
> > if it were lighter than jack rack and more stable.
>
> Don't forget that we are talking about a complete rewrite of JACK Rack 1
> (which is quite stable in its own right).
>
>   Leslie
>
> --
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x52D70289
> http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/
>
>

>From the om site.

The Om engine (which can be built by itself) requires:
Liblo 0.22 and above
Jack 0.99 and above.
And can optionally use:
Alsa sequencer
DSSI
LADSPA

It would also be great for overworked Dave to get some help ;-)

Loki



More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list