[linux-audio-user] Re: Need for JACK Rack (2)?

[leslie.polzer at gmx.net]

Hello Loki,

On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:11:58AM +1100, Loki Davison wrote:

> As i said originally, om is big and powerful with it's standard gui.
> The engine however is very light weight

Also in terms of dependencies?

> if it were lighter than jack rack and more stable.

Don't forget that we are talking about a complete rewrite of JACK Rack 1
(which is quite stable in its own right).

  Leslie

-- 
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x52D70289
http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20060206/3189b395/attachment.pgp