[linux-audio-user] Re: rosegarden+dssi

[Carotinho]

Hi!

Alle 10:26, venerdì 10 febbraio 2006, emanuele ..:: www.rumoridifondo.com ::.. 
ha scritto:
> is there any benefit using rosegarden as dssi host rather than
> jack-dssi-host?

The main reason is that when you save your project, Rosegarden save the 
configuration of your DSSI, patches loaded and so on, so you don't have to 
open jack-dssi-host with the right plugin and load the patch you needed. 
Besides, you can add directly some LADSPA to the DSSI track, without 
referring to another software. Final point, but this is more related to my 
setup, when I route the UART midi of my soundcard to Rosegarden, and I select 
a track inside Rosegarden, whichever channel I play on my MIDI keyboard, it 
gets translated on the fly (my midi keyboard is an arranger playing on 
different channels), while on Jack-dssi-host you have to route the midi 
everytime you change the instrument, choose the channel etc.

These are the reason why I'm fond of DSSI, it makes easier working with synths 
in a sequencer, just like VST. 

Byez!

Carotinho

	

	
		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it