[LAU] Foul Language

[Dave Robillard]

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 21:52 +0100, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 10:36 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> > Is it really necessary? Can we say the same thing in a nicer manner?
> > Maybe a hundred posts one after another: That must suck, et al. I think folks 
> > of our intelligence and talent can do better.
> 
> Since when is "suck" classed as "foul language"? 

Heh, no kidding... this thread is just hilarious.  All this over
"sucks"!
 
Wow, guys.  Just.... wow.

-DR-


P.S. This thread sucks