[LAU] A year of Linux Audio revisited - would like to know your oppinion

[bradley newton haug]

oh cripes..

Going out of your way to find ways to be offended and play the underdog
doesn't help anyone either.

my statements stand unamended for the sake of accuracy in this thread.

Linux is just fine for professional audio.





On Dec 12, 2007 12:19 AM, Robert Persson <ireneshusband at gmail.com> wrote:

> bradley newton haug wrote:
> > I said nothing of the sort, Freud probably would, but that's not
> > really my field.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2007 11:33 PM, Robert Persson <ireneshusband at gmail.com
> > <mailto:ireneshusband at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     The point I am making is please stop posting stuff to this list
> >     implying
> >     that other list members are untalented idiots and that their music
> >     is shit.
> >
> >
> Well, as I have said elsewhere, my own skills as a musician are very
> limited and so I have to rely on sequencers to realise my ideas.
> Therefore according to you I indulge in amateurish keyboard noodling and
> am incapable of producing any music of worth. So yes, you have insulted
> my work. It is also pretty obvious that you Rob <lau at kudla.org> feels
> that you have insulted his work. Nor is it exactly a secret that a lot
> of other people on this list use step sequencers of one sort or another,
> which means that you have insulted their work too. Please just get on
> with you need to do, ask for advice if you need it, provide constructive
> advice when you have it, and encourage other people to do whatever it is
> they do, even if it isn't really your cup of tea. Trashing each other's
> work gets none of us anywhere.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20071212/351e9de1/attachment.htm