[linux-audio-user] status of ams

[Atte André Jensen]

Folderol wrote:

> You are not comparing like for like. ARM processors raw number-crunch in
> FAR fewer clock cycles than x86 architecture. Typically 3x (I might
> be a little out of date with those figures).

Hmmm, so you're saying it should compare to something like a dual 900mhz 
machine when running csound (or ams or zyn)?

That might be enough...

-- 
peace, love & harmony
Atte

http://www.atte.dk      | quintet:      http://www.anagrammer.dk
                         | compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositions