[linux-audio-user] This criticism of jackd valid?

Lars Luthman lars.luthman at gmail.com
Sun Jan 21 08:15:16 EST 2007


On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 07:46 -0500, Chris Metzler wrote:
> As much more of a music maker than a developer, I'm not able to evaluate
> whether this post from a current thread on Slashdot is a valid criticism
> of JACK:
> 
> http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=217898&cid=17700570
> 
> I'm curious what people here think?

Isn't the --nperiods option used to get multiple JACK periods per
hardware buffer?

--ll
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20070121/f6d359da/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list