[LAU] dssi_convolve problem

[Edgar Aichinger]

Sorry for the noise! I was 2 weeks without internet at home, and somehow 
didn't read carefully the posting in the forum. Maybe just too much information 
to digest after such a long break... 

Toni mailed back to me privately and explained that the name change is intentional.

Edgar

Am Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2007 schrieb Michael Bohle:
> It is fixed, see: http://forum.jacklab.net/viewtopic.php?p=1977#1977
> 
> regards
> Michael
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2007 22:19 schrieb Edgar Aichinger:
> > Am Montag, 4. Juni 2007 schrieb Florian Schmidt:
> > > On Monday 04 June 2007, plutek at infinity.net wrote:
> > > > SOLVED: just tried jack_convolve, and got complaints about not being
> > > > able to find libconvolve. took a look in /usr/lib and found that there
> > > > was only libconvolve.so.0.0.8 with no libconvolve.so.0 symlink. added
> > > > the symlink, and all is fine.
> > > >
> > > > is this a SUSE packaging problem?
> > >
> > > Sounds like it. I mean: even if the install target in the libconvolve
> > > Makefile is broken [which is actually an option since i have no idea what
> > > i'm doing ;)], SUSE shuoldn't ship the broken build from it..
> > >
> > > Flo
> >
> > It seems a simple but annoying typo in the Packman/SUSE spec file has
> > broken the "update logic" for this package: on my system i have an older
> > package version libconvolve-0.0.8-0.pm.1, which doesn`t list
> > /usr/lib/libconvolve.so.0 via rpm -qf although the file is there (that's a
> > mystery to me, because i am sure i didn't create such a link myself, maybe
> > a relict from an older version). The current Packman package is called
> > libconvolve0 (which looks like a typo to me, especially because the -devel
> > package still is named libconvolve-devel), and therefore it isn't seen as
> > an update by any package manager... I just posted a bug report to the
> > package maintainer, should be fixed soon.
> >
> > Something else i find quite confusing: very many -devel packages from
> > SUSE/Packman contain the unversioned .so symlink for the package. Maybe I
> > don't understand the reason for this, but that just doesn't make sense to
> > me... I thought usually only static libs and header files go to the -devel
> > packages. We (jacklab people) had to ask the jack packager to move that
> > file to the main package because some application opened the jack library
> > via this file, which forced the user to install the jack-devel package, or
> > create the symlink manually, if they could figure out at all what was going
> > on...
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-audio-user mailing list
> > Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
>