[LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?

[Julien Claassen]

Hi Frank!
  I still have a little problem with the "loosing" "winning" idea. Ok: we 
might say we get a simple choice on track most wanted and definitely up them 
to the main server. But what about using simple .html file with listings and 
enable others to include "loosing" tracks into the lists. So everyone can VERY 
easily download EVERYTHING and do what they want. Because: It might just be, 
that someone has a great idea with a "loosing" track, that is an absolute 
killer-mix/master. Besides that, I still agree. Simple enough and generally 
effective enough. But with the.html solution, we could more easily split up 
the project-data, if it get's to big or to much bandwidth consuming. I think 
there are a lot of us with enough storage, but lacking the bandwidth.
  About timestamps: Why not take seconds or samples (in 44.1kHz). I know 
ecasound is able to go by samples (which is maximum accuracy. What about the 
other apps: ardour, audacity, etc...?
  Finally about MIDI: Why not have a midi-basetrack. Produced the most easily, 
easily aligned to perfect notes. And I assume everyone has a midi-sequencer 
and something to export midi. It's posibble with timidity, ecasound(using 
timidity), probably fluidsynth... It's small, simple, clean, you can read 
notes from it if necessary, it's standard and everyone has it.
 Kindest regards
      Julien

--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)

======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de