[LAU] [LAD] Is TerminatorX development stalled?

[gerald mwangi]

Well the reason for why I'd like to develope tX is its midi capabilities
and the workflow.
I want to use it as a sampler triggered by an external sequencer, and
not actually as a DJ-proggy. I dont know how good the midi capabilities
of Mixx are. 

In general Mixxx and tX are incomparable, since Mixxx only allows for 2
turntables, or am I wrong?
Gerald

On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 00:20 +0100, Dubphil wrote:

> rosea grammostola a écrit , Le 30.12.2009 22:53:
> > gerald mwangi wrote:
> >   
> >> OK, I'll start to work on it, but it will take some time.
> >> Maybe someone has experience with librubberband?
> >> Gerald
> >>     
> > Is it really a good idea to spend time on TerminatorX? Couldn't you 
> > better add 'Abbleton features' to mixxx, hydrogen or non-sequencer/daw? 
> > It looks to me those apps have more potential to survive.
> > I could be wrong though.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > \r
> >   
> 
> Mixxx hasn't the same scratch taste, Tx scratch effect is really 
> amazing, I don't know why...
> IMHO It would be nice to make it survive, but personnaly I don't need 
> the Ableton feature :)
> 
> Regards
> 
> Philippe
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20091231/de783077/attachment.htm