[LAU] Ext3 or JFS (or other) for linux audio?

[Ray Rashif]

2009/9/7 Ray Rashif <schivmeister at gmail.com>

> JFS is low-latency, low-power, and all-around performer. As such, it suits
> a mobile platform with 5400RPM disks.
>

Oops, forgot to continue:

For speedier and larger disks, ext3/4. Both XFS and ReiserFS have their
cons. Google and you'll land upon a pretty old review, but JFS and EXT3 come
up ahead of the others.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20090907/72b51bb8/attachment.htm