[LAU] perhaps why some of us have more trouble w/ pulseaudio than others (ICE1712/M-audio delta problem w/ pulseaudio)

[david]

rosea.grammostola wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:34 -1000, david wrote:
>> Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin at linuxuse.de> wrote:
>>>> This musing about "broken" alsa-drivers that need to be "fixed" in the
>>>> thread at PA increases the bad feeling about PA's relation and awarenes
>>>> to pro-audio.
>>>>
>>>> best regs
>>>> HZN
>>> PA is specifically for 'desktop' usage, pro-audio isn't a part of
>>> that. If you're doing pro-audio you'd be running JACK anyway. I
>>> struggle to understand why a user would want PA, with all the inherent
>>> latency concerns (compared to JACK) to control their pro-audio
>>> soundcard.
>> Perhaps Pulse really just wants to get rid of JACK in the first place?
> 
> ???

Replace JACK entirely with Pulse, become the only audio server game in 
town? ;-)

-- 
David
gnome at hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community