[LAU] perhaps why some of us have more trouble w/ pulseaudio than others (ICE1712/M-audio delta problem w/ pulseaudio)

[rosea.grammostola]

On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:41 -1000, david wrote:
> rosea.grammostola wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:34 -1000, david wrote:
> >> Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> >>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin at linuxuse.de> wrote:
> >>>> This musing about "broken" alsa-drivers that need to be "fixed" in the
> >>>> thread at PA increases the bad feeling about PA's relation and awarenes
> >>>> to pro-audio.
> >>>>
> >>>> best regs
> >>>> HZN
> >>> PA is specifically for 'desktop' usage, pro-audio isn't a part of
> >>> that. If you're doing pro-audio you'd be running JACK anyway. I
> >>> struggle to understand why a user would want PA, with all the inherent
> >>> latency concerns (compared to JACK) to control their pro-audio
> >>> soundcard.
> >> Perhaps Pulse really just wants to get rid of JACK in the first place?
> > 
> > ???
> 
> Replace JACK entirely with Pulse, become the only audio server game in 
> town? ;-)
> 

Paranoid? ;)

No, here Pulse nicely suspends when I start qjackctl and not vice
versa... Jack rules here ;)

\r