[LAU] [LAD] Some new things to play with
robin at gareus.org
Wed Oct 13 01:16:08 UTC 2010
On 10/13/10 02:37, Jeremy wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:11 PM, <fons at kokkinizita.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 04:49:59PM -0400, drew Roberts wrote:
>>> Does the software world need a better way to handle this reputation
>>> (The rest of the world in general as well perhaps?) Is there any way to
>>> a signed binary where this can be checked from within the binary itself?
>>> Perhaps stick the signature at the end of the binary and have the signing
>>> routine check all but the area that holds the signature? (Not well
>>> out, just an off the cuff idea.)
>> Nothing new is needed. Except maybe a more widespread awareness
>> that if the free software world is turned into the Far West it's
>> not going to last.
>> There are three of them, and Alleline.
>> Linux-audio-user mailing list
>> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> Is releasing changes to other peoples' software really the equivalent of
> "the Far West"?
I think it refers to the fact that Torben did not add himself as Author
to the source-code and left no reference other than the git log entries.
OTOH in Torben's defence: It's kind of tricky to do so: There's no
AUTHORS file nor any ChangeLog or README which usually come with FLOSS
projects to simplify that process.
Torben stated it's very ad-hoc, but it would have been nicer to first
mail this to Fons rather than LAU.
> Isn't that the entire point of releasing something under the GPL instead of,
> say, a shared source license?
> If you don't like the work he did, by all means, disassociate yourself from
Easier said than done.
> but please, don't say that you're not going to release any more software
> just because someone released a change to a GPL program of yours.
I second that.
More information about the Linux-audio-user