[LAU] New blog about Recording on Linux

[david]

Atte André Jensen wrote:
> On 10/01/2011 08:44 PM, david wrote:
> 
>> There's no need to require Javascript for site navigation.
> 
> I see it this way: I have two options:
> 
> 1) Start a life long quest to convince the 1.000.000+ sites to behave, 
> which means at least no flash and no javascript. This will probably make 
> me die earlier and angrier with out really making a difference.

Well-designed sites that use JS for navigation will still have 
navigation that works without JS.

No need to convince sites about this. Just go elsewhere. If they're 
trying to sell something, there are piles of other sites out there 
trying to sell the same things. You buy from the one that doesn't 
require Flash or Javascript for navigation, only needs it when you go to 
buy things.

> 2) Adapt. Install flash and turn javascript on. This will me use more 
> websites with less frustation, with little or no added risk.

I use NoScript. It enables me to selectively (and temporarily) enable 
Javascript and/or Flash for a site. So I can allow the JS that a 
particular site needs, while blocking web-tracking scripts such as 
Google Analytics and other tracking tricks used by Facebook ...

-- 
David
gnome at hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community