ken at restivo.org
Thu Aug 2 19:25:54 UTC 2012
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:38:35AM -0400, Joe Hartley wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:19:02 +0200 (CEST)
> "Patrick Shirkey" <pshirkey at boosthardware.com> wrote:
> > IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing on this one. After all
> > the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio platform
> > over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out of
> > the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having the
> > courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list.
> I found it odd that the klang developer has this thing for power management.
> My studio machine is not a laptop running on battery power, nor does it
> have a heat problem. I really couldn't care less about whether my audio
> subsystem allows the CPU to throttle back. My latency is around 5ms, and I
> don't have any problem with routing apps through JACK. My studio system
> has been very stable for years now.
> Not only is he solving a non-problem, but he's trying to do it without
> tapping the knowledge base of the people who have been working on this
> for years, and he's trying to do it in a way that is counter to decisions
> made at high levels in the kernel dev circles about using FP in the
I'll jump in on this power-consumption silliness, just because I'm procrastinating.
Almost exactly 3 years ago I did a 3-hour gig on an EEE using battery power. Unintentionally-- I thought I'd plugged in my netbook but I hadn't, and didn't discover it had been unplugged until I was packing up after the gig.
No problem, and I still had tons of battery left.
I was running an Ingo RT kernel, jackd, linuxsampler with a huge piano sample library, bunch of LADSPA plugins, fluidsynth, and probably some other stuff as well.
It was a duo gig-- me and a drummer-- and if anything had messed up I'd certainly have known it. Nothing did.
Yeah, anecdotes are not data, but still, neither is what this klang guy is on about.
More information about the Linux-audio-user