[LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant.

[Paul Davis]

On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net>wrote:

> On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 12:44 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf
> > <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net> wrote:
> >         On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 09:19 -0800, Len Ovens wrote:
> >         > On Sat, December 22, 2012 7:42 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >         > > On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 14:58 +0000, John Murphy wrote:
> >         > >> Synth manufacturers: Why no ADAT out?
> >         > >
> >         > > Would be nice for homestudios today, assumed there would
> >         be cheap cards
> >         > > with several ADAT inputs. My RME card only has got one
> >         ADAT, that btw.
> >         > > does not work with Linux.
> >
> >
> > and what card would that be?
>
> RME HDSPe AIO
>
> >         ADAT can do 48KHz, 96KHz and 192KHz. Nobody will use 44.1KHz
> >         for
> >         pro-audio, so that wouldn't cause an issue.
> >
> > the usual ralph misinformation. does it ever stop?
> >
> > ADAT supports 44.1kHz and 48kHz as-is. With the S-Mux "standard", it
> > can route 88.2kHz and 96kHz signals, but each channel is split across
> > two ADAT channels, causing a 50% reduction in the number of available
> > channels.
>
> Can you give an example for misinformation by me?
>
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2012-November/013570.html
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2012-November/013572.html
>

i have at least 3 ADAT equipped devices that support 44.1kHz via ADAT.

claiming that ADAT cannot support 44.1kHz is just wrong.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20121222/37e56fa7/attachment.html>