[LAU] State of RME Raydat?

[Moshe Werner]

Hi an Welcome!

I had the same question some time ago (like a year ago) and decided to go
with the HDSP 9652, no problems at all!
It is a very stable system (which I'm running at 2.9ms latency).
Initially I wanted the Raydat but the Linux support status was not clear...

Warm regards,
Moshe

P.S.: Very nice studio and site! I too use Linux for professional work and
am very happy with the results. Don't understand why not more people go
over to Linux for pro needs.

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Jason Jones <poeticintensity at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello all.  I'm new to the list, although I shouldn't be.  I've been
> running a Linux-based recording studio now for 10 years, and doing it
> professionally for 3.  I use ardour, hydrogen, muse2, mixbus, LinuxDSP, and
> a bunch of OSS LADSPA and LV2 plugins.
>
> I recently decided to jump into the RME arena (currently using an Echo
> Audiofire12 for my converters and interface, and it works beautifully) and
> am finding it oddly difficult to get good results from google concerning
> the state of new-ish RME products and Linux compatibility.
>
> Has anyone out there used the Raydat interface successfully with the WCM
> (word clock module) add-on card?   Does the hdspmixer work with the raydat?
>  Are there any shortcomings, or any reason I shouldn't use it in a
> professional studio?
>
> I thought it'd be a good idea to refresh the internet new RME info,
> because the latest update I can find is from September of 2011.
>
> Any info is welcome!
>
> Thank you!
>
> --Jason
> www.advancedbudgetstudios.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20120118/80de2729/attachment.htm>