[LAU] Linux Audio podcast. episode003: commenting replies

[Rui Nuno Capela]

On 08/15/2013 12:42 PM, Harry van Haaren wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona at gmail.com
> <mailto:louigi.verona at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     http://www.louigiverona.ru/?page=projects&s=writings&t=linux&a=linux_podcast
>
>
> I'll remember this in particular:
> Recurring bugs (that have been reported & return afterwards) are the
> worst kind.
>

i had to listen the 2 and 3 podcasts offline while resting off diving on 
open waters (no pun) so this might be kind of retarded reply anyway :/

i have a feeling--a strong one if i may--that the OP bug is on my
   http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/678

happily, i'm still on vacation/holydays now and still, that doesn't make 
to justify an incomplete bug report and followup process. ah, always the 
process, when evidences are due late or never coming... yes, Louigi it's 
you who i'm looking at ;)


> On a side note, attempting to build a group of "testers" is something
> I'll look into, and post a new topic to list when I have my mind made up.
> Cheers, -Harry
>

right on. LV has been one of those "soft-core" testers ever still, maybe 
anymore? lap003 tells me otherwise, but hey Louigi, software development 
is no simple craftsmanship, complex software is serious business and old 
and new assumptions are always caught in the open

i have this kinda metaphor for that old returning bug case: short 
blanket syndrome. yep, an anti-pattern of its own--simply put: you may 
fix or close one but will most certainly open one another often hidden 
and even dead older--the most hideous bugs just lurk in there, believe 
me, i know ;)

cheers
-- 
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rncbc at rncbc.org