[LAU] Art's suitability for anything
Charles Z Henry
czhenry at gmail.com
Mon Aug 19 17:38:53 UTC 2013
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net>wrote:
> There's no clear boarder between art and not art.
Whether something is art or not is typically a bogus question. This kind
of argument confuses whether something "is" art with its quality as art.
The evidence that something is art is that it has been composed or intended
If you want to further remove the role of its creator from that definition,
you can say that whether something is or is not art is simply self-evident.
Everything else is in your interpretation and your judgment of its
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Linux-audio-user