[LAU] jack2 vs. jack1/zita vs. jack2+zita-a2j, performance differences

Paul Davis paul at linuxaudiosystems.com
Thu Apr 17 09:16:29 UTC 2014


On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:23 AM, michael noble <looplog at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com>wrote:
>
>> so in those tests using -A SB, the bridge follows the server
>> configuration and adds no latency.
>
>
> Ah, reading the 0.124.0 release notes it also seems that -A SB is
> full-duplex, so perhaps a fair comparison after all?
>

-A SB is full duplex. the final test was done with just zita-j2a which is
just for playback. so not entirely fair. the correct test with jack1 would
be to use

    -I SoundBlaster:zalsa_out/-dhw:SB

which will use the internal zita bridge client for playback only.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20140417/09fc32d4/attachment.html>


More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list