[LAU] jack-rack poll

[Alexandre DENIS]

On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 15:00:59 +0200
Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net> wrote:

> What do you do, if you start an old production, were you used
> jack-rack? Wouldn't it annoy you, when jack-rack won't be available
> in the future? There seem to be several packages were software "a" is
> replaced by "b" and "x" by "y". IMO we should be safely rely on
> backwards compatibility.

It would have been good to have LV2, VST and SFZ support added in
jack-rack, with backward compatibility, but it didn't happen. So
switching from jack-rack to Carla was the second best solution.

Now, what would be really great would be to have Carla (+Catia &
Cadence) in Debian.

-a.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20150823/bf3da7dc/attachment.pgp>