[LAU] Jack sample-rate

[Lorenzo Sutton]

On 12/12/2015 16:07, Paul Davis wrote:

[...]

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Filipe Coelho <falktx at gmail.com> wrote:
>>     But yeah, since this was something that JACK was not designed for,
>>     *all* major clients that exist right now do not support this.
 >>
> it wasn't just that it "wasn't designed for". we explicitly discussed it
> and decided that the mere possibility of a changing SR imposed too much
> of a burden on clients.
>
> i still don't know, in retrospect, if this was a correct analysis.
>

Out of curiosity, what would have been the possible use case(s) for 
actually supporting this at Jack level?

Lorenzo.