[LAU] [LAD] After LAC is before LAC

Chris Cannam cannam at all-day-breakfast.com
Sat Apr 16 17:57:37 UTC 2016

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016, at 01:32 PM, Markus Seeber wrote:
> On 04/16/2016 02:39 AM, Gerald Mwangi wrote:
> >  I just didn't anticipate that it would be of that much of interest
> > given that LAC is mostly developer or software  oriented :)
> Was LAC like that this year?
> I wasn't very motivated to participate because from looking at the wiki
> I got the impression that it was mainly meant for users, unless as a
> developer, you wanted to present your own software. Sure, two or three
> things about plugin development/physical modelling but that seems to be
> it. Did I get the wrong impression?

In my experience as a developer, it's a good place to meet and chat to
other developers, and the content of the programme is almost irrelevant
for that. I've enjoyed it every time I've been, though I didn't manage
to make it this year.


More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list