[LAU] The future of audio plugins ?

pierre jocelyn andre temps.jo at gmail.com
Thu Oct 13 19:21:01 UTC 2016


I improve the code step by step.
The future will decide
hope not to be quoted, especially when it comes with beliefs.
I do not say that the code is well done, I say that the concept works, and
that the code needs to be improved. I improve the code step by step.
cordially

2016-10-13 21:12 GMT+02:00 Robin Gareus <robin at gareus.org>:

> The future of audio plugins ?
>
> Hopefully none... the whole concept of loading some binary blobs into
> some host and expecting scalable reliable realtime performance is absurd
> to begin with. Oh well, I suppose it could be worse.
>
>
> > Plugins that network themselves together, sharing audio analysis,
> > sharing data, taking decisions together on how to apply themselves as
> > a group to an audio track, to stems, to a whole session.
>
> Would that not be like an instrument playing itself?
>
> > Is there any standard protocol currently in the works that would
> > enable plugins of various companies, of various projects, to be able
> > to exchange data ?
> >
>
> The only existing one with a complete ontology that I know of is LV2.
>
> You can network LV2 plugins already: e.g. Ingen provides for message
> ports, CV ports as well as control-port networks (apart from usual
> audio/midi) in a modular fashion.
>
> ciao,
> robin
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20161013/45ea78f2/attachment.html>


More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list